The internet is brilliant. There's hardly a day that goes
by when I don't check up on news, refresh a bit of my memory on
some obscure band or go on a journey around the blog archipelago.
Its development has undoubtedly brought about a democratisation of
information and provided a platform for criticism and
analysisthat is largely
ignored by the traditional media.
The communications industry has been wrestling with these issues
for a number of years. How do you protect brands from attack when
setting up a critical website or blogis such a routine thing
to do?
How hard should you rebuff them? If you do rebuff them, are you
risking raising their profile and driving yet more traffic to the
very places you are trying to undermine?
With reportsthat
brands are increasingly under online attack, these questions are
going to continue to occupy communications professionals in the
coming months and years.
So, how to respond? The answer must lie in the values of the brand
in question. Remember brands are a simple set of associations
connected to an organisation or an individual.
These associations (brand values) will have settled into a pecking
order with particular attributes taking precedence over others.
These in turn will have been carefully crafted to aid the
objectives of the brand.
It is the dominant values that will determine responses and it is
the job of the communications professional to identify which are
the dominant associations and develop a response in accordance with
them.
No comments added for this entry.
POST A COMMENT