Still want us to spend, spend, spend?

Michael Sluming

Michael Sluming

On last week's edition of the Money Programme, retail advisor and Telegraph shopping columnist, Mary Portas, attempted to save shops in the town of Tewkesbury, which has been well and truly credit-crunched.

Portas quite accurately described the place as "looking like a graveyard", with more shops closed than open.

And while this is undoubtedly a bad time for retailers, and worse for those losing their jobs in the sector, there reaches a point when you wonder if getting back to "shopping as a favourite pastime" is really a great idea.

One of the people profiled in the programme was a "shopaholic" air steward who had £20,000 on her credit card. With a tone of regret in her voice, Portas explained how people like this had cut back on their spending. But surely they should cut back? Or better yet, not get into that position in the first place.

As she explored what Tewkesbury had left to offer, viewers were shown a lingerie shop with all the romantic atmosphere of a neglected garden shed.

In her other programme, where she refits shops and advises on sales technique, our "Queen of Shops" would've torn the place to shreds. But instead she sympathised, worried that if you couldn't sell "sex, fun and a bit of frou frou" (none of which were apparent from what I could see) then what could you sell?

People have stopped spending money for a reason, and it isn't in the long-term interests of anyone to grow an economy based on people spending money they don't have on rubbish they don't need.

COMMENTS

No comments added for this entry.

POST A COMMENT