On Monday Channel 4 screened the
latest instalmentof Hugh
Fearnley-Whittingstall's campaignto encourage the
great British public to buy chickens which have been bred in
conditions higher than the lowest standards allowed by relevant
law.
Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the argument, a fascinating
aspect of the programme was the role of the media in the unfolding
story. While the treatment of animals bred for slaughter has been
an issue for many years, this campaign has seen it elevated to new
prime-time heights.
Last night's programme centred on Hugh's battle with one
specific supermarket chain and his attempts to force a change in
policy from the inside: he bought a single share and forced a vote
at the shareholders' AGM.
Throughout the programme the value of the media was demonstrated
repeatedly as both sides of the argument made their next moves on
the pages of the national newspapers and on TV news broadcasts.
Clearly concerned for its corporate reputation, the supermarket
provided an on-camera interview - always a good idea as the media,
like nature, abhors a vacuum. This principle was clearly
demonstrated as Hugh's repeated requests for an interview were
eventually granted as delaying further would cause more damage than
it was worth.
Responding in the appropriate way and within a suitable time scale
is vital to maintaining the values you are trying to uphold or
promote for yourself or your business.
Honesty and candour should always remain as part of your armoury
in times of reputation management. I'll leave it to you to
decide how you would respond to
thisparticular complaint.
No comments added for this entry.
POST A COMMENT