We've had about a week now to digest the design of the new
Liverpool
brand and it's fair to say that it's been as warmly
received as it was ever going to be.
What is certain is that it was received much more positively than
the pitiful London
2012 Olympics branding! The City of Liverpool's
decision to launch the brand with an accompanying
vision documentto '…improve the lives of every
man, woman and child in the city.' was a good one. It added
depth and substance to the launch: something that could have
provided an easy target for the nay sayers.
What is also interesting to note is how traditional Liverpool's
approach to developing a new brand is. It has settled on an emblem
using a representation of the city's skyline and this is
exactly the right place to start as the skyline is recognisable
around the world.
Consider how different this is to the current and rather convoluted
Manchester 'non-brand' brand: original modern. The
fact that it requires explanation leads you to its understanding.
The theory goes something like: Manchester already is a brand and
it means something 'out there in the real world' regardless
of the design of a logo that you slap on it. This meaning is a
product of everything that is connected to it, its past and
present. A brand is therefore not something you design from scratch
in a studio. But you can define and settle on an essence, which
sums up a city's uniqueness or ideal, around which new ideas
can coalesce and a better future forged. In Manchester's case
these are originality and modernity.
So is Liverpool the same? Does it need a new brand? Can it possibly
have one through a new design? No, of course it doesn't and it
hasn't got one. What it has got is a new logo which will, in
time and to an as yet undefined level, become part of its brand.
The city will always mean much more than any logo can sum up. The
vibrancy, history, determination and splendour of Liverpool are not
easily summed up in one pithy statement, partly as they are, in
some senses, contradictory.
And maybe that's a starting point in helping the evolution of a new Liverpool brand.
John QB - Thu 2nd Apr 2009
Leeds. Live It. Love It
Jo Spragg - Wed 1st Apr 2009
As all us marketing types know, branding is always a contentious issue! I agree that, on the whole, the new logo has been well received (http://tinyurl.com/dhhg9p) and I'm sure it won't be too long before the good people of this city get behind it and make it as popular as its predecessor.
Robin Cooke - Wed 1st Apr 2009
Whereas I understand the need for a city brand, the recently unveiled one is far too messy and convoluted to constitute a logo. There's too much detail in it, and looks like a poor relation to the elegant 08 brand. If anything, it's an average illustration which crams the city skyline into a crowded space. The brand guidelines represent some great values but I personally don't feel that it's reflected in the visuals - which as a mistake.
POST A COMMENT