I'm pleased that global warming is not responsible
for the sudden proliferation of roses in the office and glad that a
nice gesture by our noisiest red
has been accepted for the thoughtful gesture that was
intended.
Sadly, however, it seems that the smallest of comments and gestures
can still be badly misconstrued and be deemed 'politically
unacceptable'.
Firstly, let me set my record straight - having worked in the
middle east for a few years, and travelled pretty extensively, I
have no pre- or mis-conceptions about race, gender, age, colour or
anything that happily individually distinguish us from the other
6.2 billion who share our wonderful planet.
Black is that, just black, age is just that, age, ethnic origins
are just that. Let's just accept it - we can rejoice in such
matters but to draw erroneous conclusions based on one very small,
though clearly important element of a person's make-up is
clearly not a helpful route to understanding.
So, for example, in the absence of malice and reinforcing
stereotypes, does
Prince Harry deserve such censure? Is it wrong to use
the term
elderly? Do we define Barack Obama by
his colour alone?
I don't think so. Let's celebrate our differences but not
be afraid to be honest about them. Let's also recognise that
descriptions and adjectives are just that - part of, but only part
of, the wide and wonderful people we are.
andrew binns - Mon 16th Feb 2009
how do you refer to liverpool fans again martyn?
POST A COMMENT